Day 1 Emergent Village & Postcolonial Conversation

by Daniel Fan

Well, Day One of the 2010 Emergent Village Conversation is over.  Actually no it’s not because a bunch of theologians went to a gastropub to continue the party as only theologians can.  I’ll see if I can make it there myself, but first an update for you, my readers.

Registration started at 2:30, but nothing was scheduled till 5:30 (dinner).  This gave plenty of time for the kind if informal hobnobbing that really serves as a value-add to the scheduled conference offerings.   I caught a ride to a local coffee joint with Dwight Friesen, a professor at Mars Hill Graduate school in Seattle.  Along the way we discussed topics like “what is the Emergent movement” and conference demographics.

After returning, we finalized the setup for tonight’s “conversation” with Richard Twiss.  This took a hilarious turn when we parted the stage curtains to find that the painted backdrop was a golden prairie scene.  I advised the setup crew that while the irony of using such a scene in a post-colonial conversation might be clearly apparent to those who were present, a photo taken out of context would cast Emergent Village as incredibly tone-deaf.  We all agreed that the curtains would stay in place (but we did show the scene to Richard Twiss who LOL’d).
A bit of housekeeping: the scheduled main events are broken into three categories.  The first is the “conversation” where an author or theologian has a conversation with two moderators.  The questions are preplanned, but moderators can improve if led.  The second format is “interaction” where audience members are encouraged to ask questions and/or dialogue with the author/theologian—we haven’t had one of these yet, so I will have to report the exact details of this practice later.  Finally, there will be a “workshop” session where four speakers present various topics and you get to choose to go to one.

Upon completion of setup I went to dinner with about a dozen conference goers, including conference planner, Melvin Bray.  It’s here were I was asked, and accepted, the chance to be a moderator for the conversation with Musa Dube.  Kinda nervous, but I’ll let you all know how that turns out, or doesn’t.  Musa Dube doesn’t pull any punches in her book, so it should be an interesting conversation.

During dinner, I had the chance to ask Dwight and Melvin about their reaction to Soong Chan Rah’s critique of the whiteness of the Emergent movement.  They both agreed that his early criticisms were accurate, and that the lopsided preponderance of white, male, mega-church pastors which characterized the early phases of the movement was unfortunate and said a lot about the movement itself.  But they defended the Emergent movement by stating that, since then, there has been a conscious effort to diversify and hear other voices, something which Rah hasn’t yet taken into account in terms of his criticisms of the contemporary Emergent movement.

Tonight’s conversation opened with Native American Lakota member and head of Wiconi International, Richard Twiss burning sage as a prayer.  Richard then invited Jodi Scott-Treviso to perform another prayer, this time in the form of a jingle-dress dance.  I’m pretty sure this isn’t the first sage prayer that some of the mostly-white audience members have encountered, as they deftly wafted the smoke over themselves with practiced hand motions.

Richard gave his introductory story, which can be found elsewhere.  But then he was asked to dispel the myth of white American innocence over the fate of Native America.  Twiss pointed out the expected milestones like manifest destiny, but then turned his remarks to the imperialist interpretations of the gospel and the canonization of native peoples (relative to Exodus and Joshua).

When asked how he would avoid imperializing the gospel, Richard gave a few examples (I am distilling liberally here):

  1. Seeking out permission of existing tribal authorities before entering the land. This is in stark contrast to the historical reliance purely on the divine mandate + human agency and timeline.
  2. Allow Christianity to exist in native a form. Fear of syncretism often drove new native Christians to employ purely foreign forms and expressions of Christianity (guitars vs drums, adoption of western dress exclusively, destruction of native emblems and implements). Twiss correctly pointed at that the longer native Christians worshiped Creator using foreign forms, the longer Christianity would be perceived by other natives as an invasive foreign and colonial religion.
  3. Develop an academic program where native-driven theologies and studies are not merely elective would-be-nices, external to an essential Western/systematic theology-centric core (such a program is underway at George Fox University under the guidance of the North American Institute for Indigenous Theological Studies).
  4. Find an indigenous way to refer to your faith. Twiss uses the appellation “Follower of the Jesus way” instead of the baggage-laden term “Christian.” He stated that this name personalized his relationship with Jesus to a much greater degree than the more common western name.
  5. Be comfortable with ambiguity and mystery that is the Creator.
  6. Redefine “church” outside of western walls. Meetings with other followers of the Jesus Way in settings other than buildings with steeples count, as well as sweat lodges.

That’s it for tonight guys.  I’ll try to check in throughout the day and answer questions if I am able to.

This entry was posted in Daniel Fan, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Day 1 Emergent Village & Postcolonial Conversation

  1. Daniel Lowe says:


    Thanks for the update! One question here, what was the response to Richard’s lecture?


    • Daniel Fan says:


      Richard’s conversation session was well received. I didn’t hear anyone take issue with a single thing he said. However, people did have a problems with accepting a response he gave to a question during his interaction session which happened yesterday (and of which I will include it my recap of Nov 2nd).

      I wish I could post same-day, but with the way our informal sessions are going past 12Am the next day, and the fact that there is, mysteriously, no wireless at the hotel, I’m having to post early the next morning.

  2. Good to see these discussions are still occuring yet I find the majority of the members of the “White Christian Church” still do not want to really listen to our hearts or really get to know us. Most still have a Native Ministries branch believing Indians need to be saved from our Indianness. I have been sharing this message for over 35 years and still find the church very slow in accepting any other form of doing church other than the Euro-American – Canadian way.

  3. hewhocutsdown says:

    Twiss intrigues me, a lot of the same questions are being asked by the Bedouin in the Middle East, and similar accommodations being made.

  4. Art Brokop II says:

    I am overjoyed that the “emergent community” is hearing and interacting beyond the white male mindset (obviously plowing fallow ground is not a harvest however maybe a seed can take root toward a indigenous voice). Most of the opposition I have encountered (speaking about Creator in an indigenous way) derives from fear of stepping outside of this fortress comfort zone. As much as many may take offense at this I think (even for “scholars”) the rejection of non dominant expression reveals mental laziness as well as a lack knowing WHY one believes as opposed to just WHAT. With the down playing of sacrament so prominent among protestant (western) expressions wherever rites of passage or ceremony become a belief expression paganism starts to be the response. We have got to start to examine if an activity expresses a means of grace if so why throw that means away. Are not the many tribes and nations the diversity of the omniness of Creator/Yahweh that can not be expressed through only one people-group. Thus many expressions bring Him glory!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s